|
TESTIMONIALS
| |
Hi
Joe,
Just wanna let you know of the result of
me almost getting caught by a traffic-camera
even though I was using the PhotoBlocker...
I wrote to you awhile ago telling you that
I got a ticket. You asked for a copy of
it. Well, I never got it. I don't know if
you are aware of it, but in Norway, they
use a lot of digital cameras with flash
alongside the roads. These cameras operate
in such a way that you can fool it with
PhotoBlocker spray.
I'll explain more. First, what happened
to my ticket? They mailed me the ticket,
noting that I could come down to the station
and check. I did. They had this huge machine
that showed the black & white picture
of the front of the car. The plate was all
white. It was amazing it was all overexposes
just the way PhotoBlocker claims. "So,
there's no number on the plate - how do
you know it's my car?", I said.. "Oh",
the female cop said. "Check this!"
She turned a knob, and slowly the picture
got darker until you could somewhat make
out the characters on the tag... "Shit!",I
said silently to myself... "But you
still can’t tell what the numbers
are. That one could be an “8”
or “0”" and the other one,
it cold be a “B” or a “D”.”
I said. "You can’t do that. You
can’t doctor the image. You are tampering
with evidence. That is not admissible in
the court of law.” I added. She was
dumfounded. I could tell she was totally
caught by surprise. "I will have to
get my supervisors.” she said looking
at me with disgust. "You better! I
replied”, confident that she didn't
know what to do. I knew I was on to something.
My brain was working overtime. I knew they
could not tamper with the picture. All they
did is make it blurry enough to guess what
the characters could be. I knew I could
beat them in court if they dared to fine
me. After a while she came back from the
back office and she said “You don’t
have to pay for it today. We will investigate
and get back to you with a decision.”
She said. I new I had made it.Long story,
but it’s been six months and I haven't
heard anything more from her, so I guess
I'm off the hook. I figured they dropped
the charges. So, the point is:Photoblocker
did what it was supposed to do. It over
exposed the image to the point where it
was white. The argument that you could look
at the negative of an overexposed image
and read the tag number is bogus. The inverse
of an overexposed white blob is a black
blob and vice versa. Besides, they can not
‘TAMPER WITH EVIDENSE’. It won’t
stand in court. They know that and now we
know it. Thanks guys. You have earned a
loyal customer. Keep up the good work.
Just to let you know.
Best
Regards
Ivan, Norway |
|
| I
encourage everyone to use PhotoBlocker Spray
and products like it. I have personal experience
that faulty cameras can issue uncalled for
tickets. I’ll be happy when the red-light
cameras disappear permanently from every intersection
in North Carolina.
Fair studies show that any
gains in safety can be attributed to longer
duration yellow lights rather than the cameras.
Worse, the entire program is a profit-making
venture involving deals between our government
and a private contractor that creates incentives
to issue more citations than is justifiable.
— David W,
—
High Point, North Carolina
|
|
I
bought this for my husband and he loved it.
We just were able to get this product in the
UK and it works. I bought 20 can from a dealer
here because my husband runs a mobile maid
service and would get photo ticket at least
3-4 times a month, then he would have to find
out who was driving... when and try to prove
it was the employee to dock their pay.
He applied to all 113 cars WITHOUT telling
the Maids... he has not received a ticket
in over 3 months. He does not want the people
to drive reckless but it has saved him a lot
of time and money. Mary
H.
Manchester,
UK
|
|
|
Red-light
cameras, speed cameras etc… have nothing
to do with safety. If the intersections
where the cameras are located are so dangerous,
why have the cities not done anything further
to reduce the danger? The red-light camera
was not a solution to the problem. The problem
is the drivers that the police are not seeking
to remove from the road.
Protect
yourself. The decks are stacked against
you. Thanks PhotoBlocker for giving us a
fighting chance. I wish you all the best.
—
Darryl W,
—
Modesto California |
|
|
|
Seeing
red
By Tom W.
Walking away from the Carol Miller Justice
Center, I thought they should take the third
word out of the name. I had just seen: a law-enforcement
officer practice law without a license, a
defendant unable to get discovery evidence
for his defense, and a refusal by the judge
to allow the defendant to see all the evidence
against him. Beyond that, I saw a judge treat
the obviously overmatched defendant with a
condescending attitude. In one respect, it
would appear to be only a red-light-camera
case. A ticket. But this is a criminal matter
with a huge fine ($351!) and points tacked
onto your record, and that leads to a bigger
car-insurance bill. But, more importantly,
the traffic court is where the majority of
people come in contact with the justice system,
and to see this kind of steamroller in operation
would shake anyone’s confidence in the
entire system. (See “Red light, green
cash.”) Sitting where the prosecutor
should be, and looking like a prosecutor,
was a highway patrolman essentially prosecuting
the case. He was trained by the red-light-camera
company and gave expert testimony by rote.
The judge even asked if the officer would
like to give closing arguments. There is no
district attorney to ask for discovery evidence;
the district attorney tells defendants to
get it from the law-enforcement agency, which
in this case ignored the defendant’s
request. When the defendant called out, “Objection,”
during the officer’s testimony, the
judge ignored the objection and then told
the defendant to hold it until later, which
defeats the purpose of the objection--to stop
evidence from going on the record. When the
defendant asked for records regarding the
camera, which the officer was testifying about,
the judge told the defendant he should have
subpoenaed the company before trial. When
the nervous defendant would make a mistake
in questioning, or a simple misstatement,
both the judge and the prosecutor--excuse
me, the officer--would look annoyed and roll
their eyes.
This outrageous system is meant to expedite
trials. It sure made me come to a quick conclusion
about the word “Justice” in the
name of the building.
http://www.newsreview.com/issues/sacto/2004-11-25/editnote.asp
|
|
|
| I
have tested PhotoBlocker on my own car. The
first time, I ran one camera (in safe conditions)
and received no ticket after 3 months. I then
ran another 2 cameras to be sure, and again,
after 2 months, no ticket. On all three occasions,
the cameras were detected by the Beat radar
detector (which means that they were switched
on) and they flashed. Eric
B.
Doctor
Washington, DC
USA
|
|
|
| Before
I bought the photoblocker spray I received
3 speeding ticket in less than 2 months. After
I applied photoblocker spray never got one.
I remember several instances where the camera
flashed behind me and still didn’t get
any tickets. Erin
M.
Football Coach
Phoenix, AZ
USA
|
|
|
| Although
up until the 8th September 2004 I was receiving
frequent fines by mail, I have not received
one since I applied Photoblocker to my number
plates! Good luck with an excellent product.
Leanne
College Professor
Manchester, UK
|
|
|
Product
was easy to apply on both my front and back
plates. After 6 months of use it appears to
have withstood the elements with no problem.
I can confirm 3 times when I have had pictures
taken of me by speed trap cameras and to date
have received NO fines in the post.
The first instance was the infamous Heidelberg
camera's on the N3 highway to Durban 3 months
ago and the last incident was a laser camera
mounted on a bridge on the M1 highway near
Wits University this incident was 2 months
ago. Jack
P.
Mechanic
London, United Kingdom
|
|
|
| My
family received up to $1500 fine just in red
light cameras. After buying the photoblocker
spray from phantomplate.com, I was able to
spray all of my families car with 3 cans.
We haven’t seen any tickets since then.
Ralph
K.
Financial Advisor
New York, NY
U.S.A.
|
|
|
I
recently sprayed Photoblocker on my car before
taking a trip to Durban. For only R380, I
thought it was well worth saving myself the
exposure of fines which could reach the thousands.
It went on quite easy. During my trip, on
the stretch of road from Pietermaritzburg
to Durban, I twice got ‘flashed’
by cameras installed on the side of the motorway.
This is aside from the ones which I did not
spot. The first time I was doing about 60
to 40. That was four months ago, and I have
yet to see a fine. Well done, what an excellent
product !
Gil L
Teacher
Durban, South Africa |
|
|
| It
would help if there were many more signs indicating
the limit for that particular stretch half
the time you can travel several semi-rural
miles without knowing whether you’re
in a 30, 40 or 50 zone!! So without even knowing
the exact speed limit is you get panelized
for going 5 miles above the speed limit. I
am not the speeding type but I feel confident
and comfortable for using the Photoblocker
spray. Peter
F.
Dentist
Washington, DC, USA |
|
|
| I
have a problem when a machine decides my violation
and the human element is removed. I have a
problem companies getting about half of the
revenue generated from these machines. What
a waste! You could pay an officer to patrol
for cheaper, and they would use discretion
in writing you a ticket. Instead of complaining
about it I started using the photoblocker
spray to protect my plates. Manolis
S.
Security Officer
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
|
