|
| Before
I purchased the Photoblocker I asked the local
cops about the spray and they laughed at me
and told me not to waste my money. They also
told me that the use of Photoblocker spray
is specifically banned in the state of Illinois.
If the product didn’t work why would
they ban it? Would the government spent taxpayer
money to specifically ban Photoblocker if
it was ineffective? It was apparent to me
that the product must really work if the cops
are telling me not to use it and if the state
of Illinois banned it and it has passed Tom
Martion’s sniff test. Well it’s
been 6 months now, and I’ve been flash
a few times and I haven’t gotten a single
ticket. Mark
B.
Chicago,
IL
|
|
|
| I
heard about Photoblocker from friends. I have
your product on my cars and know it works.
I don't speed in residential areas. But out
on the straight way I go with the flow about
5-9 over. I have been flashed many times,
with no ticket. Thanks photoblocker, I hope
you sell millions of these cans. Peter
H.
London UK
|
|
|
| This
stuff must work I have not received a traffic
camera ticket since using photoblocker. I
sprayed it on my SUV about eight months ago
and the tickets have stopped coming. Now I
am not scared to open my mail box fearing
there will be a ticket. James
D.
Bank Manager
Chicago, IL
USA
|
|
|
I
purchased a can of Photoblocker Spray about
1year ago, amazing stuff !!! have never seen
a fine since !! I would like to order another
can and would like to know who your dealer
in Johannesburg is?
Regards,
Photoblocker Supporter of note Dean
Business man
Johannesburg, South Africa
|
|
|
I've
never had a speeding ticket but I never speed
;-) Some of these permanent 40 speed zones
are coming out in the most stupid areas. I
can understand reducing the speed at school
areas when there are kids around, but a lot
of them don't need to be 40 when no-one is
around - hell, I can ride faster than that
on my bike and not get a fine!!
Let's see, buy a can of photoblocker for around
$30, or get several +$100 speeding tickets
for doing 53 in a 50 zone (they have a 3KM/h
leeway in Victoria). I think I know which
option I'd prefer. V.
Ioannidis
Lawyer
Sydney
Australia
|
|
|
I
recently bought a can of Photoblocker over
the internet at www.photoblocker.co.za sprayed
it on my plates, I have been through several
red light intersections in the evenings on
numerous occasions and to date I have yet
to receive a fine, I believe Photoblocker
has already paid for itself.
Thank you Photoblocker. Joseph
K, B.,
Software Engineer
Charlotte, North Carolina
USA
|
|
|
| Speed
cameras are all about collecting money, not
reducing accidents. if you have (something)
fitted to your car, not a laser jammer, that
tells you to slow down, thats what the police
want you to do? slow down, not break the limit
then they get £60 and you get 3 points.
why is it done so sneakily, hidden transit
vans, back of motorbikes? so you cannot see
them. By using the photoblocker I am protecting
myself from traffic cameras. S
Taylor
Casher
Long Beach, CA
USA
|
|
|
| Hello,
I
am interested in becoming a dealer here
in central California and I am currently
in active law enforcement here.I believe
your product is legal to use/sell and Iam
confident there is great demand for it.
What do I have to do in order to
become a representative of your fine product
in California?
Thank you for any information.
W. Y. |
|
|
Speed-trap
cameras are stupid, says ex-top cop
BLAST: Former chief
inspector Neil Longsden
ONE
of Greater Manchester's top former traffic
policemen has branded the use of speed cameras
on the region's roads as "stupid". Former
chief inspector Neil Longsden, who was second
in command of Greater Manchester Police
motorway group, hit out at the way cameras
are used to raise revenue rather than to
improve safety.
He said: "When fixed speed cameras were
introduced I thought they were a good idea
because they were positioned at accident
hotspots. But now the situation is becoming
stupid.
[
BACK TO TOP ] |
|
